Exorcist director brands sequel ‘worst film ever’

‘The Exorcist’ director has branded its sequel a "f***ing disgrace".

Filmmaker William Friedkin – who was at the helm for the original horror classic in 1973 – didn’t return for the sequel four years later and he has now insisted it’s the worst film he has "ever seen".

Speaking on the ‘Movies that Made Me’ podcast, he ranted: "I tell you, I did see a great deal of ‘Exorcist II’, under the following circumstances. I was at the Technicolor lab, color timing something, and one of the timers said, ‘We just finished Exorcist II, would you like to have a look at it?’

"And I don’t know why, but I went into the room and I sat through maybe 40 minutes of it. It’s the worst piece of s**t I’ve ever seen. It’s a f***ing disgrace.

While Friedkin praised the cast – which saw the likes of Linda Blair and Max von Sydow reprise their roles as Regan MacNeil and Father Merrin from the original – he felt the second film disrespected William Blatty, who penned the novel used as source material for the big screen adaptation.

He added: "And God, what a cast it had — Richard Burton, and Max von Sydow, and Louise Fletcher, plus Linda Blair. James Earl Jones.

"That’s the worst 40 minutes of film I have ever seen, really, and that’s saying a lot."

‘The Exorcist II’ had Academy Award nominee John Boorman at the helm alongside its stellar cast.

However, scriptwriter William Goodhart had only penned one movie before working on the sequel – and only wrote one afterwards.

Despite being panned by critics at the time – and since – it was followed by ‘The Exorcist III’ in 1990, while ‘The Exorcist: The Beginning’ (2004) and ‘Dominion: Prequel to the Exorcist’ (2005) were all made to continue the franchise.

What do you think?

546 points
Upvote Downvote

Ellie Bamber wants to be ‘moved’ by the roles she takes on

James McAvoy changed approach to acting for Glass